A bit of Nostalgia

twice the fun
Post Reply
vinyl master
vinyl engineer
vinyl engineer
United States of America
Posts: 20399
Joined: 01 Nov 2013 05:27

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by vinyl master » 05 Mar 2016 02:50

I'm guessing the Roberts was Califone, notorious for their "school" record players, and that the train is a T-gauge...As a model train buff, I know it's not HO scale! :lol:

Tinkaroo
vinyl addict
vinyl addict
Canada
Posts: 7512
Joined: 04 Feb 2011 20:00
Location: Pixie Hollow by The Bay

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by Tinkaroo » 05 Mar 2016 10:08

Roberts was made by Akai. :mrgreen:

I had no idea that they made a combo reel to reel/eight track recorder even though I know the eight track is much maligned. They actually made pretty good recordings.

dualcan
long player
long player
Canada
Posts: 3564
Joined: 15 Nov 2013 22:53
Location: Sorel-Tracy Quebec
Contact:

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by dualcan » 05 Mar 2016 11:22

Tsk Tsk Tsk VM....
Look at the couplers...and the manufacturer is the one who invented them....
And Roberts is indeed made by Akai but Califone is also connected:
http://museumofmagneticsoundrecording.o ... berts.html
Regards,
k

Hugues TR4
long player
long player
Belgium
Posts: 1235
Joined: 21 Apr 2009 10:33
Location: Belgium

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by Hugues TR4 » 05 Mar 2016 11:58

dualcan wrote:...And Hughes gets the big price or 1219 lever which ever comes first....
I would love to see a picture of the DRIVA if you have one. I found only a very few DRIVA units on Radio Museum and a jukebox, but they are not SABA products.

VM is right on both counts! The PE Rex AA which I had already changed against the original Rex A, would, from the time the pic was taken, soon be changed again for a 1007a, which was a stupid downgrade (in hindsight), if ever there was one! The TK 46 would not last for more than three month before it got thrown out against the TG 12a. The Grundig constantly chewed up tape because of the complicated tape travel / pinch roller to capstan mechanics. The TG 12 was around $50- more expensive if memory recalls, than the TK46 but from then on and until this very day, apart from several tune ups, works like a charm.

28382
Some of the reasons for this, is the solid mechanical set-up and the huge Dual manufactured motor (and equally large flywheel) which puts the TT motor to shame:
TG12 Motor vergleich1.JPG
Last year I saw a sad looking TG28 (which is an improved abysmal TG 27 btw), so I decided to see if I could get this tin crate to function. After a complete restoration it looks al-right and function as it should:
TG 28 007.JPG
The motor in this unit is a slightly differently arranged 2 pole motor from a 1010 or so which hardly has enough power to rewind or fast forward:
100_6821.JPG
The only real highlight in it is the Dual manufactured record/play head.
Hi Klaus,

You won't believe it: the big prize arrived yesterday!
The Santa Maria finally escaped from the mermaids and arrived safely, bringing the long awaited lever! Thanks again!
Still have a partial pic of the Driva taken at my Sister's 18th birthday party (1962).
Will try and scan it, but you can only see the facial part with the tuner.
Actually, DRIVA was a Belgian radio producer from Schaerbeek, one of the Brussels surrounding suburbs. The manager was called Drion and, after abandoning local production, he started importing German radio and stereo products, which he rebadged under his own brand name: it made DRIon and VAn... something (can't remember the right name). I thought they were SABA's or possibly Telefunken's...
He later ran a big electrical sales store in the 70ies.
Will check if I can still find another pic in my late parents old photographs.
Cheers!

Hugh.

dualcan
long player
long player
Canada
Posts: 3564
Joined: 15 Nov 2013 22:53
Location: Sorel-Tracy Quebec
Contact:

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by dualcan » 06 Mar 2016 23:29

Enter 1969!
The battle of the turntable protagonists goes to a higher pitch (pun intended..) as seen here.
On page 3 as usual we have:
69 1-1.jpg
(486.28 KiB) Downloaded 708 times
The next page has as a reply:
69 1-2.jpg
(193.8 KiB) Downloaded 705 times
It is interesting to note that both parties are right and talking past each other- naturally.
The Garrard motor invention is a masterpiece and Dual will pay royalties for this design.
The heavy platter is still necessary for its flywheel effect because although the Garrard motor syncs into the 50 or 60 hertz, this by no means is a perfect governor. The power grid does have minute errors in frequencies, but all this is outside of the normal human perception in any event.
The Garrard 301 and 401 is a fine testament for a heavy platter and a resounding argument for the positive flywheel effect.
... Now if you put the two together.. but I'm getting ahead of myself....

A proper governor will come from the Japanese turntables in the form of Quartz control which both of these companies avoided, in case of Dual, for way too long and Garrard totally, enabling the Japanese turntables to conquer the market.
But the battle of these two will rise to a higher level soon.
In the mean time, the Japanese invasion of electronics is taking over the North American and then the European market -quietly - with equipment that is getting better all the time and most importantly at prices that are affordable.
The demise of the old staunch producers is inevitable.

Here we have a new line-up with Rotel:
69 1-3.jpg
(197.38 KiB) Downloaded 704 times
The Japanese manufacturers will incorporate new technologies as soon as they are available, and to boot, design and produce more and more of these parts themselves.

This is an ad for the eve growing Sansui line up:
69 1-4.jpg
(401.65 KiB) Downloaded 707 times
In this time frame we see the Euro adds for Grundig receivers with a whopping 15 watts per channel at higher prices; ditto for the Dual amps which are no longer advertised but still available for die-hearts..
Many of the American firms just cave in and start re badging; as will happen everywhere else, much the same as the complete take over of the TV market went.

Occasionally we get a "me too" ad :
69 1-5.jpg
(367.25 KiB) Downloaded 705 times
Elac or Electroacoustic Kiel (1899) was first and foremost in the under-water Morse code (sound) transmission business. In 1948 after U-boats and their sound requirements where no longer required..., they would enter the new field of record players. Early PE and Dual would incorporate Elac ceramic carts (later on magnetic carts as well) and Elac would in turn use motors from them. Until 1956 they would be world leaders in this market and along with PE and Dual would make up 90% of the world market in record player production. In the seventies, the yearly output of Elac would be in the vicinity of on million units with a staff of around three thousand employees. after the bankruptcy in 1978, the still active underwater research section would go to Honeywell and the audio side is still active today with the production high end loudspeaker systems:
http://elac.com/
And that's the quints of the day!
Regards,
k

Dual_Jean
senior member
senior member
Posts: 255
Joined: 24 Jan 2015 04:25

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by Dual_Jean » 07 Mar 2016 13:02

Fascinating Klaus! :-D

dualcan
long player
long player
Canada
Posts: 3564
Joined: 15 Nov 2013 22:53
Location: Sorel-Tracy Quebec
Contact:

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by dualcan » 08 Mar 2016 00:15

..And the "heat" will be raised a tad higher:
69 2-1.jpg
(441.91 KiB) Downloaded 682 times
This add seems to imply, if you want to accompany a vinyl disc and your piano and record are out of tune, it is easier to retune a piano's 88 keys to match the disc, as opposed to simply changing the pitch of the disc via the record player's pitch control.
It's doable....
The manner in which the Garrard is verified is exactly the same for any turntable. The Dual protocol for testing called for a test disc with 3150 Hertz as opposed to 1000. Either frequency is sent to a wow and flutter meter which has a crystal controlled generator of 1000 or 3150 hertz internally. The record (player) signal is now compared to this signal and the deviation is then calculated and shown in W & F figures. All owners manuals should have these figures in the tech specs.

Now our other folks:
This ad is very close to the end of line for the 1000 series chassis. The hybrid 1210 and 1212 have started the transition.
69 2-2.jpg
(287.41 KiB) Downloaded 685 times
Because the Real News is not quite ready for sale, we yank the other guy’s chain by pointing to all the OEM's using Dual units.

How many and which types do you see??:
69 8-3.jpg
(435.19 KiB) Downloaded 685 times
BTW the ad says the anti-skate is coupled automatically to the tracking force. This applies only to the 1212. There is none on the 1210 and the other three have separate controls; somebody slept at the wheel!
Sony is not shown but will also join the fray, then there is one Japanese outfit that thought otherwise. We'll see him later.

...And in other (old) news we see another British Invasion-one heck of a tape unit!:
69 1-6.jpg
(391.32 KiB) Downloaded 681 times
Ferrograph- built like a battleship was probably a very apt description!
The Pioneer speakers are along for the ride...I believe they where made locally.

A true American Icon and a class act is next:
69 2-3.jpg
(291.43 KiB) Downloaded 683 times
The testing procedure is somewhat different but with their experience in speaker design you can bet its not a gimmick.
And that's a wrap for today!
Regards,
k

vinyl master
vinyl engineer
vinyl engineer
United States of America
Posts: 20399
Joined: 01 Nov 2013 05:27

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by vinyl master » 08 Mar 2016 03:30

It's interesting, too, that the Dual ad states this...

"Dual turntables are so good, in fact, that several big stereo makers don't even use our most expensive model in their most expensive models.

They figure our second-best is more than good enough. And that's not bad for a family of turntables that sells for under $130."

I wonder how many Garrards can say that, although there were some very good ones made... :-k

I also wonder what the percentage/ratio of sales in the shops were for both Dual and Garrard at this time...Did these ads work in swaying buyers and sellers towards one or the other?

In any case, it sounds like no love lost between those two companies at that time...Must have been quite a spirited debate in hi-fi circles among aficionados, too...

DualDude1010
junior member
junior member
Posts: 13
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 11:17
Location: Home of FDR, N.Y

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by DualDude1010 » 08 Mar 2016 10:59

Wow, flashback ... Love the 8 track "changer". :shock: Have to question reliability...

dualcan
long player
long player
Canada
Posts: 3564
Joined: 15 Nov 2013 22:53
Location: Sorel-Tracy Quebec
Contact:

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by dualcan » 08 Mar 2016 17:43

This trip through the old mags is just a hoot for me! I wish I could scan all the stuff...
Before we turn the flame up another notch between our main combatants, lets look aside a bit. Here is the new Kenwood with "Field Effect Transistor" front end:
69 2-4.jpg
(329.56 KiB) Downloaded 668 times
and something new from Sony with- well you check it out:
69 3-03.jpg
(236.63 KiB) Downloaded 664 times
It seems strange that the Japanese manufacturers managed to make good quality taperecorders in a short time, but never mastered the record changer. All the Japanese TT's are manual and I surmise that the Asian home market was pretty well in line with the Euro market which lost interest in the changers with the advent of real HI FI equipment. The enormous market was North America which would not let go of the changers for a long while. Dual and the other good combatants simply made good decks and it would seem it was cheaper to incorporate some of these, rather than invest in a design that would possibly be outdated soon.
If a changer however could behave as a manual, then it would fare much better. This is probably the benchmark of the 1200 series, because devoid of auto spindle, it will operate as a manual with the power switching automatically activated as opposed to the earlier 1000 series. Having a 12" (or close to) platter as the Elacs and PE had, certainly helped. No, the 1219 is not yet on the market- be patient....

Here we have another bunch of things:
69 2-6.jpg
(323.84 KiB) Downloaded 663 times
I like the RC1 inclusion and it is an early changer manufacturer but not the first.
The first commercially produced unit was the "Automatic Orthophonic" model by the Victor Talking Machine Company (eventually RCA), which was launched in the USA in 1927.
But this is also not the first because the inventor was in all likelihood an Australian by the name of by Eric Waterworth of Hobart, Australia, 1925 (wikipedia).

Here is another Sony which is starting to come on strong and not cheap in all sense of the word:
69 2-5.jpg
(242.98 KiB) Downloaded 664 times
Finally we must have a changer:
69 2-8.jpg
(281.15 KiB) Downloaded 662 times
(do you remember when there was such a thing as service?)
The weekly BSR production at its height would reach 250,000 units.
Dual would figure at its best 6,000 units a day, just to contrast.

It is a mystery to me why the importer Musimart did not extent import the Beograms for a long time, since they did not have any restriction placed on them. Did they really think they could place a BSR besides a B&O.. Granted both started with a "B"...
And for another 13 cents, who was the "big wig" changer manufacturer prior to BSR?
Regards,
k

vinyl master
vinyl engineer
vinyl engineer
United States of America
Posts: 20399
Joined: 01 Nov 2013 05:27

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by vinyl master » 08 Mar 2016 22:57

Hey, Klaus...The "big wig" manufacturer...Was it "The Voice Of Music", or V-M Corporation? Didn't they have a lot of their changers in Zenith consoles?

I'm curious, too...Did all the lower-end manufacturers like General Electric, Panasonic, Westinghouse, and later Soundesign also incorporate BSR changers into their equipment? :-k

Were they the two major low-end suppliers, or were there other start-ups out there?

dualcan
long player
long player
Canada
Posts: 3564
Joined: 15 Nov 2013 22:53
Location: Sorel-Tracy Quebec
Contact:

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by dualcan » 09 Mar 2016 03:27

Right you are! V-M (Benton Harbour) was the real big player which was supplanted by BSR. A good overview of the firms history can be seen here:
http://thevoiceofmusic.com/about_vmae.html
To service the European market they licensed overseas manufcaturers. For a long time I was wondering about the early Telefunken changers models TW 501 to 504. These units were sold like hotcakes and OEM'd to to other manufacturers such as Grundig.
Having now looked under deck of both units, the TW 500 series is unmistakably V-M
V-M:
http://thevoiceofmusic.com/vm_rec_chang ... tables.asp
Telefunken:
http://www.grammofoon.com/Telefunken/im ... hassis.jpg
The changing mechanism is identical with only small changes.
Telefunken used an AEG 2 pole patented motor. This motor has two coils arranged in such a way as to act as noise self cancelling. This patented design was also used for the Dual tapedecks TG27 to 29.
In the early days (50ies) V-M changers were in all the US made consoles, re-badged of course. When the manufacturers started to import rather than manufacture (late 60ies) BSR replaced the V-M's.
There were some other manufacturers such as Monarch ( a BSR subsidiary) and the now Plessey owned Garrard cheaper lines. Nobody made higher volumes than V-M and subsequently BSR.
Regards,
k

Melos Antropon
senior member
senior member
Posts: 488
Joined: 02 Feb 2016 04:31
Location: SW Michigan

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by Melos Antropon » 09 Mar 2016 04:56

dualcan wrote:.
Here is another Sony which is starting to come on strong and not cheap in all sense of the word:
69 2-5.jpg
Not cheap at all is right. When you run $575 dollars through the CPI inflation calculator, it says that $575 dollars in 1969 funds was the equivalent of $3700 in 2016 funds! That was back when high fidelity really *was* a "rich man's hobby".

Tony

DSJR
long player
long player
Wales
Posts: 2986
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 20:29
Location: Suffolk

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by DSJR » 09 Mar 2016 21:56

I weep when I see the Garrards, which had a good basic design in my opinion, being ruined by Plessey bean counters and sloppy tolerances. it wasn't until the Zero 100 and the belt driven 'SB' models using this chassis that the quality came anywhere near Duals of this era.

Coffee Phil
vinyl addict
vinyl addict
United States of America
Posts: 5801
Joined: 20 Sep 2008 08:22
Location: California

Re: A bit of Nostalgia

Post by Coffee Phil » 09 Mar 2016 22:46

Hi Dualcan,

I just found this thread. Since the days when I had my 1229Q (don't worry, it went to a good home) I have wondered what on earth they meant by "continuous pole" motor. Can you explain?

Thanks,

Phil
dualcan wrote:The date for this ad was 1964. I have every month from mid 1965 till 1983, way past Dual Steidinger era. I can bore you to tears !
Yes every Dual is listed - I just need to check and scan two meters or so of magazines..... Of course the Garrard ads are just a page or two away....
This could be a real job!!
Hmm, what the hell did I get myself into????
BTW, if you read the poop on the 1010, it stated that you can get the 1010 for $59.50 with a 2 pole motor and for $69.50 a 1010 with a "continuous pole" motor. This is the same motor as the 1009 and the 1019.--something to keep in mind-right?
k

Post Reply