What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

snap, crackle and pop
JaS
engine room
engine room
Posts: 11041
Joined: 12 Feb 2002 17:32

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by JaS » 11 Feb 2019 11:35

goatbreath wrote:
11 Feb 2019 10:15
I have a fully Upgraded RB250 and a Non modified one.
I've used loads of arms (Dynavector, Mission, Roksan, SME, Pierre Lurne, Technics, Audio Technica, Sumiko etc) but keep going back to Rega. They are cheap and sound good. If I was regularly changing cartridges I'd probably get another SME 309 or Dynavector DV505.

raphaelmabo
long player
long player
Sweden
Posts: 1355
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 21:01
Location: Askersund, Sweden
Contact:

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by raphaelmabo » 11 Feb 2019 11:35

The Rega RB250 is a modest and good working arm. A Workhorse and a no frills design. It just works well. But there are certainly more advanced and interesting options out there with even better performance, for example the Funk Firm F5 tonearm. I would consider this one an upgrade.

JaS
engine room
engine room
Posts: 11041
Joined: 12 Feb 2002 17:32

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by JaS » 11 Feb 2019 12:18

raphaelmabo wrote:
11 Feb 2019 11:35
But there are certainly more advanced and interesting options out there with even better performance
No argument there, I just found that when I was between arms my RB300 seemed to fill in nicely, then one day I realised that my backup had become my main arm.

I still have a Tabrizz Zi and a Mission 774SM on a shelf, both of which have their strengths and weaknesses, and if I'm still listening to records when I retire (just 15-20 years to go!) I might grab an SME310 or a Breuer 5/6 :)

Beobloke
senior member
senior member
Great Britain
Posts: 609
Joined: 08 Sep 2004 10:43
Location: South UK

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by Beobloke » 11 Feb 2019 13:54

raphaelmabo wrote:
11 Feb 2019 11:35
The Rega RB250 is a modest and good working arm. A Workhorse and a no frills design. It just works well. But there are certainly more advanced and interesting options out there with even better performance,
I think this sums up my attitude to the RB250 perfectly. It's a fine performer and a bargiain at its price point, however I'd prefer to save a bit longer and have an RB300 instead, which I think sounds better.

And as to the whole modding one with new counterweights, stub, bearings, wiring etc. - life's too short...

hedgehog35
member
member
Scotland
Posts: 90
Joined: 22 Aug 2013 00:33

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by hedgehog35 » 11 Feb 2019 15:38

retrofan wrote:
11 Feb 2019 04:46
Its a Rega!
Good to get incisive, well - argued posts on the forum!

andybeau
long player
long player
England
Posts: 3552
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 20:47
Location: Coventry, UK

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by andybeau » 11 Feb 2019 18:04

hedgehog35 wrote:
11 Feb 2019 15:38
retrofan wrote:
11 Feb 2019 04:46
Its a Rega!
Good to get incisive, well - argued posts on the forum!
It's a Rega hate thing from a people who usually have never heard one, :roll:

ripblade
long player
long player
Canada
Posts: 1042
Joined: 05 Oct 2008 19:51
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: What's wrong with the Rega RB250?

Post by ripblade » 11 Feb 2019 19:20

Well, to each their own. I bought an RB250 nearly a decade ago when the hype declared it a giant killer. Once I had it set up in stock form I was in disbelief at how poor it was. Maybe mine was merely a bad sample, as the shell azimuth was also visibly off by several degrees. But, since it was now in my possession and paid for, I decided to try out the many aftermarket fixes, along with an invention of my own. With all the improvements it becomes a much better arm capable of nuance and dynamics. Without these, it is a dynamic-less midrange wonder....exactly as I had remembered it from back in the late '80s.

We all listen for different things, so I take no issue with anyone who likes these. But the giants can rest easy as there's no killing of any sort going on here.