RGS0010 vs RGS0008

turning japanese
Post Reply
ohlins
junior member
junior member
Posts: 8
Joined: 18 Oct 2009 12:12
Location: Singapore

RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by ohlins » 05 May 2018 05:19

Hi,

I noted that the 0010 has a smaller diameter than then 0008, which is 290 mm vs 293 mm ....

so if I were to use the 0008 for the MK2, the outer edge will cover the raised lip of the platter .... is this supposed to be correct?

chiz
senior member
senior member
Great Britain
Posts: 565
Joined: 16 Oct 2009 23:05
Location: London

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by chiz » 05 May 2018 10:30

The original MK2 mat SFTG172-01 is approx 293mm and does sit on the raised outer edge of the platter by design.

I haven't directly compared this to the later RGS0008 or RGS0010.

ohlins
junior member
junior member
Posts: 8
Joined: 18 Oct 2009 12:12
Location: Singapore

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by ohlins » 05 May 2018 14:44

Thanks …

I supposed it’s intentional then …

Shadowman82
senior member
senior member
Posts: 562
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 23:47

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by Shadowman82 » 06 May 2018 19:03

I believe it's likely the thinner RGS0008 was designed to be used in conjunction with a slip mat . In any case if you are not a DJ and mainly use the SL-1200 for listening to music then I would use the thicker RGS00010 mat .

chiz
senior member
senior member
Great Britain
Posts: 565
Joined: 16 Oct 2009 23:05
Location: London

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by chiz » 07 May 2018 00:27

Shadowman82 wrote:I believe it's likely the thinner RGS0008 was designed to be used in conjunction with a slip mat
Yes this is true for M3D, MK5, M5G etc. but the newer GAE, G and GR are also supplied with this same mat.

Shadowman82
senior member
senior member
Posts: 562
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 23:47

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by Shadowman82 » 08 May 2018 00:03

Yes but because the platter on the new SL-1200s is better dampened you would most likely not get any sonic benefits from using the thicker mat anyway . On the old SL-1200s you did however .

Sleepwalker65
broken record
Posts: 93
Joined: 11 Apr 2018 01:25

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by Sleepwalker65 » 10 May 2018 20:01

chiz wrote:The original MK2 mat SFTG172-01 is approx 293mm and does sit on the raised outer edge of the platter by design.

I haven't directly compared this to the later RGS0008 or RGS0010.
Does that mean the SFTG172-01 is the same part as RGS0008? Or is it RGS0010?

chiz
senior member
senior member
Great Britain
Posts: 565
Joined: 16 Oct 2009 23:05
Location: London

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by chiz » 10 May 2018 21:24

RGS0010 was the replacement for SFTG172-01 and similar spec I think.
RGS0008 is thinner than either of those.

Sleepwalker65
broken record
Posts: 93
Joined: 11 Apr 2018 01:25

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by Sleepwalker65 » 15 May 2018 05:26

I bought a RGS0010 and will report on how it fits the platter of my SL-1700MK2 probably this weekend.

Shadowman82
senior member
senior member
Posts: 562
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 23:47

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by Shadowman82 » 15 May 2018 20:15

No idea what kind of mat that Technics came with originally . Hopefully it will fit .

Sleepwalker65
broken record
Posts: 93
Joined: 11 Apr 2018 01:25

Re: RGS0010 vs RGS0008

Post by Sleepwalker65 » 19 May 2018 02:32

I can tell you that the RGS0010 fits the platter of my SL-1700mk2 perfectly, just barely inside the raised lip on the outer rim of the platter.

Post Reply