
Yes, always. It's a constant-angular-velocity system so the speed of the groove under the stylus is higher at the outer versus the inner and, generally, higher speed means better quality. A normal pivoted arm can only achieve optimum tracking geometry at just two points of its arc. The various protractors and jigs reflect a number of differing opinions of where those two points should be. I assume it's possible to achieve zero tracking distortion at both the outer-most and inner-most points but such an alignment would result in huge distortion in the middle of the side. A linear-tracking (or pivoted tangential-tracking) tonearm can eliminate the tracking distortion by achieving optimum geometry across the whole of the cut area. Even then the fact remains that the maximum quality available inevitably diminishes towards the inner grooves, for the reason stated.mikewilliamson wrote:... or will these inner tracks always sound inferior in fidelity to outer groove tracks no matter what?

cafe latte wrote:My Decca and my Stantons (881 and 681) with Jico stylus have no audable inner groove distortions, poor stylus are a lot to blame IMO.
Regards
CL




mikewilliamson wrote:Just tried Stevenson. No luck. Actually, it sounds worse to me.
I wish I had another 1042 stylus lying around to test with. Maybe it's a bad stylus and I'm agonizing over the VTA for nothing.




Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013
faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine