the home of the turntable

MC Cartridge

the thin end of the wedge

MC Cartridge

Postby roballnik » 28 Apr 2012 16:08

does anyone have a simple explanation on when and why a high, medium or low output MC should be used. Is it just user preference, type of music, etc?

Thanks

Roert
roballnik
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 14:58
Location: Starrucca, PA

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Ianibby » 28 Apr 2012 16:18

As I understand it has a lot to do with the limitations of your phono stage. LOMC low output moving coil cartridge the signal is going to have to be bumped up more in order for you to get suitable sound to your ears. Tone arm I think has something to do with your choice too. I know someone on here will have a better explanation but I thought if throw in my thoughts so I could be corrected and in turn learn something. Cheers
Ianibby
member
 
Posts: 36
Joined: 13 Mar 2012 05:06

Canada

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Zebbo » 28 Apr 2012 18:31

They don't have specific uses, it's pretty much down to what phono stage you have and personal choice. If you only have a MM. (moving magnet), stage you would need a high output MC which will have an output similar to a moving magnet - around 4-5mv. A low output MC typically has an output of around 0.3mv and requires much more gain in the phonostage. I personally wouldn't bother with a high output MC I'd rather invest in a good quality MM cart. Most high quality moving coils are low output.
Pink Triangle Anniversary(Batt)/Audiomods Series 5/ZYX R100 Fuji - NVA Phono 2 - Music First Copper - NVA A80s - Martin Logan Scenarios.
Zebbo
senior member
 
Posts: 639
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 22:32
Location: Dover

United Kingdom

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby A.Wayne » 28 Apr 2012 18:51

^^^ If so , why is the Denon Dl110 so highly rated ....
A.Wayne
 

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Tedrick » 28 Apr 2012 20:17

A.Wayne wrote:^^^ If so , why is the Denon Dl110 so highly rated ....

Yep. Also, Benz Micro offers high-output versions of many of there highly-regarded MC's, all the way up to the US$3,500 Benz Ebony.
Tedrick
contributor
 
Posts: 744
Joined: 02 May 2007 04:47
Location: Florida

United States of America

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Zebbo » 28 Apr 2012 23:41

...and what would the ratio of high output to low output be throughout the moving coil market do you think? There will always be good performers of each genre but given a choice between a low or high output version of the same cartridge I'd be surprised if I preferred the high output version. I've only ever been "blown away" with the delicacy of a LOMC but obviously I've not owned every MC on the market....
Pink Triangle Anniversary(Batt)/Audiomods Series 5/ZYX R100 Fuji - NVA Phono 2 - Music First Copper - NVA A80s - Martin Logan Scenarios.
Zebbo
senior member
 
Posts: 639
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 22:32
Location: Dover

United Kingdom

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Zebbo » 28 Apr 2012 23:43

A.Wayne wrote:^^^ If so , why is the Denon Dl110 so highly rated ....


Because it's cheap as chips.
Pink Triangle Anniversary(Batt)/Audiomods Series 5/ZYX R100 Fuji - NVA Phono 2 - Music First Copper - NVA A80s - Martin Logan Scenarios.
Zebbo
senior member
 
Posts: 639
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 22:32
Location: Dover

United Kingdom

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Alec124c41 » 29 Apr 2012 01:53

HOMC cartridges that sound great, in my personal experience:
Denon DL-110
Denon DL-160
Benz MC20 H2
Dynavector DV-10x5
Sumiko Talisman Virtuoso
Benz Glyder S2 H
BlueNote Boboli

They are not all cheap as chips. ;)

Cheers,
Alec
Keep them spinning.
User avatar
Alec124c41
senior member
 
Posts: 13326
Images: 53
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 04:24
Location: Toronto, Canada

Canada

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby dlaloum » 29 Apr 2012 02:57

There was a recent (yesterday) posting by Jonathan Carr, designer of the megabuck Lyra cartridges. (a very highly respected cartridge designer)

His very interesting comments with regards to a discussion re: differences between MC and MM , was that he believes the key is the phono stage. It is very very difficult to design and manufacture a very high quality phono stage for a low output cartridge, and the really good ones are therefore expensive. (he designs phono stages as well)

It is a lot easier to design and build a high quality MM/MI phono stage - they key issue being the level of gain required, and associated issues with noise and distortion in a high gain design.

So the key thing to take away from his comments was - get the best phono stage you can afford, and then use its best capabilities...
If you have an exceptional high gain phono stage - go for LOMC...
If you have any doubts about phono stage quality - go for HOMC

In fact the best value in cartridges is always to be found at the high output levels - both cartridges and phono stage costs ramp up very very quickly as the output level drops.

The very best high output cartridges include cartridges that are considered among the best ever made (eg: the MM technics EPC100)... so the output level and the topology (MC, MM, MI) are not an indicator of sound quality (ie: contrary to popular belief MC is not superior to MM... just different).

You can purchase a high gain phono stage for under $400 - but the same money spent on a lower gain phono stage may get you better performance.

bye for now

David
dlaloum
contributor
 
Posts: 3032
Images: 187
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 06:21
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby A.Wayne » 29 Apr 2012 04:03

HOMC is relative also, they are only high in relation to LOMC and not to MM or MI type cartridges, technically they are giving the best of both worlds , enuff gain for good SN and low mass over MM/MI SETUPS ...
A.Wayne
 

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Zebbo » 29 Apr 2012 09:55

Alec124c41 wrote:HOMC cartridges that sound great, in my personal experience:
Denon DL-110
Denon DL-160
Benz MC20 H2
Dynavector DV-10x5
Sumiko Talisman Virtuoso
Benz Glyder S2 H
BlueNote Boboli

They are not all cheap as chips. ;)

Cheers,
Alec



Hi Alec
The important part is that it is your personal experience, which is all any of us can work from, and mine will be different from yours and many others :) . I've owned the DL-110, DL-160 and also Sumiko Blue Point Special, amongst others, and was underwhelmed by all of them. I only started getting what I thought was a real classy sound from an MC when I could afford to spend a bit more money, and then invariably low output. I did, however, get some lovely sounds from more reasonably priced MM carts, especially the Ortofon 2M Black and Clearaudio Aurum Beta S.
Pink Triangle Anniversary(Batt)/Audiomods Series 5/ZYX R100 Fuji - NVA Phono 2 - Music First Copper - NVA A80s - Martin Logan Scenarios.
Zebbo
senior member
 
Posts: 639
Joined: 13 Aug 2009 22:32
Location: Dover

United Kingdom

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby Hanuman » 29 Apr 2012 11:55

A.Wayne wrote:... technically they are giving the best of both worlds ...

To be fair, it would be more accurate to say that they (HOMCs) give you some of both worlds. The inevitable engineering choices required to build one tend to set limits on how closely the ideal characteristics of either type (MM or MC) can be met.
Hanuman
senior member
 
Posts: 697
Images: 52
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 07:59
Location: Bangkok

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby dlaloum » 29 Apr 2012 14:08

Hanuman wrote:
A.Wayne wrote:... technically they are giving the best of both worlds ...

To be fair, it would be more accurate to say that they (HOMCs) give you some of both worlds. The inevitable engineering choices required to build one tend to set limits on how closely the ideal characteristics of either type (MM or MC) can be met.


Each has its strengths and weaknesses - HOMC's are just a different set of compromises...
dlaloum
contributor
 
Posts: 3032
Images: 187
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 06:21
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: MC Cartridge

Postby dlaloum » 29 Apr 2012 14:15

A.Wayne wrote:low mass over MM/MI SETUPS ...


Another common fallacy ... the lowest effective mass cartridge ever was the MM Technics EPCP100mk4... and the lowest mass MC is 2 to 3 times the effective mass of that one (0.05mg if I recall correctly?) - the 2nd, 3rd, 4th place were also all MM designs...

The strengths of MC's are not related to mass.
They suffer fewer magnetic issues, and can use more sophisticated magnetic "circuits" - they do not suffer from the losses of high inductance designs, etc...

But low mass just isn't intrinsic to MC - in fact it is strongly in MM / MI cartridges favour. Mind you low mass MM designs usually have similar output levels to HOMC's.... around half the voltage out of "standard" MM's - due to smaller magnets I think...

bye for now

David
dlaloum
contributor
 
Posts: 3032
Images: 187
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 06:21
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Next

Return to Cartridges and Preamps


Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013

faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine