the home of the turntable

Home made interconnect

tales from the tool shed

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby awkwardbydesign » 05 Jan 2012 13:33

"Neutrik NY273 is well regarded as a high quality, low cost RCA connector; their insanely expensive model with a retractable ground....."
My insanity seems to be bigger than your insanity; I think they are quite cheap!
User avatar
awkwardbydesign
senior member
 
Posts: 303
Images: 50
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:01
Location: Devon

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby jlbruyelle » 05 Jan 2012 14:06

awkwardbydesign wrote:"Neutrik NY273 is well regarded as a high quality, low cost RCA connector; their insanely expensive model with a retractable ground....."
My insanity seems to be bigger than your insanity; I think they are quite cheap!

Then your pockets are much, much deeper than those of the average pro ;) Or maybe you misunderstood my sentence: I was referring to the NF2C-B/2, not the NYS273 (sorry for the typo in my previous post) which is cheap indeed and does not have a retractable ground contact.
jlbruyelle
senior member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 13:51

France

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby jlbruyelle » 05 Jan 2012 15:03

CL, maybe you should read my post before commenting it, especially using terms such as "rubbish". This sort of attitude does not serve you in the least and only contributes in spoiling the climate of what is supposed to be a well-mannered forum intended to share knowledge and experience - unless I'm mistaken and we are supposed to fight over a piece of wire? :shock:

Now for the contents of your reply:

cafe latte wrote:When the distance from the center of the conductors increases the capacitance drops, when it reduces it rises and inductance drops, it is how things work, sorry.

I did not say the geometry does not matter. I did say that many factors matter. In fact I mostly said that not all balanced cables have a higher capacitance than unbalanced ones, to which your sentence above is completely unrelated. Not willing to lecture you, but you should definitely take a course in physics for electronics, as I did. Just reading the data sheets of actual cables would be a good first step towards getting rid of the misconceptions you seem to have on this topic.

cafe latte wrote:Gold is not a good conductor, copper is the second best very very very closely behing silver.

Believe it or not, gold is very widely used to protect connectors from oxidation. It is also good enough for the internal connections of ICs, and many other uses as a conductor. Do the math and you will easily find that the difference between a 1.5m wire made of gold, silver and copper is completely negligible for the kind of application we are talking about - ok, we wouldn't make a cable out of solid gold anyway, but hopefully you get the point: the conductance difference between those materials is attached much, much more importance than it really has.

cafe latte wrote:Capacitance is very very important in phono cables as a high capacitance caple with a MM cart will alter the freq curve of the cart a lot, It is why all carts give a capacitance loading that the cart works best.

Please read my post: where did I say otherwise? I just said it is difficult to make a cable that has both low capacitance and good shielding. Is it so difficult to read?

Now please cool down and let's move on to more useful discussions. Sheesh, I should have listened to my mom when she told me not to discuss cables on an audio forum :roll:
jlbruyelle
senior member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 13:51

France

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby jlbruyelle » 05 Jan 2012 15:37

Oops, sorry again, it's NYS373 actually. Need to give up drinking :mrgreen:
jlbruyelle
senior member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 13:51

France

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby awkwardbydesign » 05 Jan 2012 20:42

jlbruyelle wrote:
awkwardbydesign wrote:"Neutrik NY273 is well regarded as a high quality, low cost RCA connector; their insanely expensive model with a retractable ground....."
My insanity seems to be bigger than your insanity; I think they are quite cheap!

Then your pockets are much, much deeper than those of the average pro ;) Or maybe you misunderstood my sentence: I was referring to the NF2C-B/2, not the NYS273 (sorry for the typo in my previous post) which is cheap indeed and does not have a retractable ground contact.

Yes, only £14 pair. This is mainly a HI-FI forum; that's not expensive for hi-fi plugs, try WBT, etc.
User avatar
awkwardbydesign
senior member
 
Posts: 303
Images: 50
Joined: 04 Aug 2010 15:01
Location: Devon

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby jlbruyelle » 05 Jan 2012 20:56

Isn't it a strange world where consumer stuff costs much more than pro stuff? :D :wink:
jlbruyelle
senior member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 13:51

France

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby LPspinner » 05 Jan 2012 20:57

jlbruyelle wrote:Hi, just jumping into the conversation to bring my 2 cents worth of professional knowledge. Such general assertions like "microphone cable has a high capacitance because it is a twisted pair" or "50 ohms cable has a low capacitance because is it is done for HF", very often prove wrong. It entirely depends on manufacturing parameters that vary widely between types.

But then there is a way to actually know: all the cable types have a data sheet available on the manufacturer's site. Check the capacitance in pF/m (or pF/ft depending on the country you live in), multiply it by the length you plan to cut, and voila, you have the capacity of your cable. Contrary to a common belief, a balanced cable can very well have have a low capacitance.



Hi Guys:

Yes: you are correct you are quite correct; I was being a little too general and broad based.

To be specific the CANARE L-2T2S twin-core cable I use for line level interconnects has a capacitance of 33pF per meter between each core and the shield and a capacitance of 22pF per meter between each core of the twisted pair. I use the cable in quasi-balanced configuration, which is one core for the signal, the other core for the earth along with the shield connected to the earth on one plug only. In this configuration the capacitance will be slightly higher. 75-ohm coaxial cable on the other hand is usually about 17 pF per meter.

Like I also said in my previous post, the difference is little more than academic unless you intend running very long lengths of cable from the cartridge to the phono pre-amp. In that case the 75-ohm coax starts to look a little more attractive. But I would also caution against trying to make a cartridge run into long cables, it would be better to locate the phono preamp closer to the turntable.

At the end of the day, for general line level use the twin core and shield microphone cable I use is easy to work with, quite reasonably priced ($Aus 2.50 per meter) and sounds just as good as any other Mega-dollar cable that you care to mention.

As for the Neutrik connector, yes they do look kind of cool, but they are more than twice the cost of the metal bodies plugs I use and I really can’t see (or hear) any benefit … sorry.

4872

LPSpinner
An optimist sees a glass half full, a pessimist sees a glass half empty. An Engineer sees a glass that is twice as big as it needs to be.
User avatar
LPspinner
contributor
 
Posts: 541
Images: 118
Joined: 29 Dec 2005 20:51
Location: That big rock south of the equator...

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby jlbruyelle » 05 Jan 2012 21:28

Hi LPspinner. I know well your Canare cable, I use it for mic and line use and it is one of the best all-around types I've met so far =D>

OTOH the capacitance figures you gave are in pF/ft, not in pF/m. The correct figures are 3.3 times higher.

LPspinner wrote:As for the Neutrik connector, yes they do look kind of cool, but they are more than twice the cost of the metal bodies plugs I use and I really can’t see (or hear) any benefit … sorry.

You are referring to the NF2C, which I too find way overkill for ordinary use. The NYS373 I talked about is very similar to the one on your photo, and costs 2 euros each. Not a bad deal for the quality.
jlbruyelle
senior member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 13:51

France

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby cafe latte » 05 Jan 2012 23:56

jlbruyelle wrote:CL, maybe you should read my post before commenting it, especially using terms such as "rubbish". This sort of attitude does not serve you in the least and only contributes in spoiling the climate of what is supposed to be a well-mannered forum intended to share knowledge and experience - unless I'm mistaken and we are supposed to fight over a piece of wire? :shock:

Now for the contents of your reply:

cafe latte wrote:When the distance from the center of the conductors increases the capacitance drops, when it reduces it rises and inductance drops, it is how things work, sorry.

I did not say the geometry does not matter. I did say that many factors matter. In fact I mostly said that not all balanced cables have a higher capacitance than unbalanced ones, to which your sentence above is completely unrelated. Not willing to lecture you, but you should definitely take a course in physics for electronics, as I did. Just reading the data sheets of actual cables would be a good first step towards getting rid of the misconceptions you seem to have on this topic.

cafe latte wrote:Gold is not a good conductor, copper is the second best very very very closely behing silver.

Believe it or not, gold is very widely used to protect connectors from oxidation. It is also good enough for the internal connections of ICs, and many other uses as a conductor. Do the math and you will easily find that the difference between a 1.5m wire made of gold, silver and copper is completely negligible for the kind of application we are talking about - ok, we wouldn't make a cable out of solid gold anyway, but hopefully you get the point: the conductance difference between those materials is attached much, much more importance than it really has.

cafe latte wrote:Capacitance is very very important in phono cables as a high capacitance caple with a MM cart will alter the freq curve of the cart a lot, It is why all carts give a capacitance loading that the cart works best.

Please read my post: where did I say otherwise? I just said it is difficult to make a cable that has both low capacitance and good shielding. Is it so difficult to read?

Now please cool down and let's move on to more useful discussions. Sheesh, I should have listened to my mom when she told me not to discuss cables on an audio forum :roll:

Apologies I was rather tired and I missed the bit were you said low capacitance for phono sections, and only read the bit were you said capacitance did not matter. Opps
Regards
CL
cafe latte
contributor
 
Posts: 5157
Images: 163
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 04:27
Location: Cattle property near Ravenshoe Qld Australia

Australia

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby LPspinner » 06 Jan 2012 01:11

jlbruyelle wrote:Hi LPspinner. I know well your Canare cable, I use it for mic and line use and it is one of the best all-around types I've met so far =D>

OTOH the capacitance figures you gave are in pF/ft, not in pF/m. The correct figures are 3.3 times higher...


Ooops - My Bad :oops:

you are quite right ... must read the catalogue more carfully... #-o
An optimist sees a glass half full, a pessimist sees a glass half empty. An Engineer sees a glass that is twice as big as it needs to be.
User avatar
LPspinner
contributor
 
Posts: 541
Images: 118
Joined: 29 Dec 2005 20:51
Location: That big rock south of the equator...

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby timbloke » 06 Jan 2012 03:17

Lets say I wanted to make a really good set of phono leads for my turntable, a really good set of interconnects for line level sources and a really good set to go between my pre and my power amp. What would the best choice of cable for each run?

Don't worry too much much about ease of soldering or connector types as I'm pretty good with a soldering iron and already know what connectors I'm going to use.
timbloke
member
 
Posts: 68
Joined: 15 Nov 2011 21:42

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby cafe latte » 06 Jan 2012 03:40

timbloke wrote:Lets say I wanted to make a really good set of phono leads for my turntable, a really good set of interconnects for line level sources and a really good set to go between my pre and my power amp. What would the best choice of cable for each run?

Don't worry too much much about ease of soldering or connector types as I'm pretty good with a soldering iron and already know what connectors I'm going to use.

Capacitance is only really an issue with phono leads. I buy soundlink as my friend sells it and he uses it for professional audio instalations (studios ect) so if it is good enough for them it is good enough for me. It is low capacitance and has a foil screening as well as the normal. It is a multi stranded core, not soild. I use if for everything with good quality plugs, it is supposed to be diectional, but I dont worry about that.
Regards
CL
cafe latte
contributor
 
Posts: 5157
Images: 163
Joined: 11 Oct 2009 04:27
Location: Cattle property near Ravenshoe Qld Australia

Australia

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby hoolio » 06 Jan 2012 09:07

I got talked into using RG6 75 ohm cable by a good friend of mine for interconnect between pre and power amp, a 7 metre run. It's a single solid conductor heavily screened. I argued against it as the negative side of the signal uses all that screen, plenty of foil and mesh.

Well they are staying. I'm surprised, even though the pro's use it in home theater installations.

You just don't know until you try it.
Man fears time
But time fears the Pyramids
hoolio
senior member
 
Posts: 189
Images: 0
Joined: 28 Oct 2009 08:56
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Australia

Re: Home made interconnect

Postby Alec124c41 » 06 Jan 2012 09:14

I had about the same length of that running from a tape out to my computer in another room. It worked well.

Cheers,
Alec
Keep them spinning.
User avatar
Alec124c41
senior member
 
Posts: 13316
Images: 53
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 04:24
Location: Toronto, Canada

Canada

PreviousNext

Return to DIY


Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013

faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine