"Neutrik NY273 is well regarded as a high quality, low cost RCA connector; their insanely expensive model with a retractable ground....."
My insanity seems to be bigger than your insanity; I think they are quite cheap!
awkwardbydesign wrote:"Neutrik NY273 is well regarded as a high quality, low cost RCA connector; their insanely expensive model with a retractable ground....."
My insanity seems to be bigger than your insanity; I think they are quite cheap!

cafe latte wrote:When the distance from the center of the conductors increases the capacitance drops, when it reduces it rises and inductance drops, it is how things work, sorry.
cafe latte wrote:Gold is not a good conductor, copper is the second best very very very closely behing silver.
cafe latte wrote:Capacitance is very very important in phono cables as a high capacitance caple with a MM cart will alter the freq curve of the cart a lot, It is why all carts give a capacitance loading that the cart works best.


jlbruyelle wrote:awkwardbydesign wrote:"Neutrik NY273 is well regarded as a high quality, low cost RCA connector; their insanely expensive model with a retractable ground....."
My insanity seems to be bigger than your insanity; I think they are quite cheap!
Then your pockets are much, much deeper than those of the average proOr maybe you misunderstood my sentence: I was referring to the NF2C-B/2, not the NYS273 (sorry for the typo in my previous post) which is cheap indeed and does not have a retractable ground contact.

jlbruyelle wrote:Hi, just jumping into the conversation to bring my 2 cents worth of professional knowledge. Such general assertions like "microphone cable has a high capacitance because it is a twisted pair" or "50 ohms cable has a low capacitance because is it is done for HF", very often prove wrong. It entirely depends on manufacturing parameters that vary widely between types.
But then there is a way to actually know: all the cable types have a data sheet available on the manufacturer's site. Check the capacitance in pF/m (or pF/ft depending on the country you live in), multiply it by the length you plan to cut, and voila, you have the capacity of your cable. Contrary to a common belief, a balanced cable can very well have have a low capacitance.
LPspinner wrote:As for the Neutrik connector, yes they do look kind of cool, but they are more than twice the cost of the metal bodies plugs I use and I really can’t see (or hear) any benefit … sorry.

jlbruyelle wrote:CL, maybe you should read my post before commenting it, especially using terms such as "rubbish". This sort of attitude does not serve you in the least and only contributes in spoiling the climate of what is supposed to be a well-mannered forum intended to share knowledge and experience - unless I'm mistaken and we are supposed to fight over a piece of wire?![]()
Now for the contents of your reply:cafe latte wrote:When the distance from the center of the conductors increases the capacitance drops, when it reduces it rises and inductance drops, it is how things work, sorry.
I did not say the geometry does not matter. I did say that many factors matter. In fact I mostly said that not all balanced cables have a higher capacitance than unbalanced ones, to which your sentence above is completely unrelated. Not willing to lecture you, but you should definitely take a course in physics for electronics, as I did. Just reading the data sheets of actual cables would be a good first step towards getting rid of the misconceptions you seem to have on this topic.cafe latte wrote:Gold is not a good conductor, copper is the second best very very very closely behing silver.
Believe it or not, gold is very widely used to protect connectors from oxidation. It is also good enough for the internal connections of ICs, and many other uses as a conductor. Do the math and you will easily find that the difference between a 1.5m wire made of gold, silver and copper is completely negligible for the kind of application we are talking about - ok, we wouldn't make a cable out of solid gold anyway, but hopefully you get the point: the conductance difference between those materials is attached much, much more importance than it really has.cafe latte wrote:Capacitance is very very important in phono cables as a high capacitance caple with a MM cart will alter the freq curve of the cart a lot, It is why all carts give a capacitance loading that the cart works best.
Please read my post: where did I say otherwise? I just said it is difficult to make a cable that has both low capacitance and good shielding. Is it so difficult to read?
Now please cool down and let's move on to more useful discussions. Sheesh, I should have listened to my mom when she told me not to discuss cables on an audio forum

jlbruyelle wrote:Hi LPspinner. I know well your Canare cable, I use it for mic and line use and it is one of the best all-around types I've met so far![]()
OTOH the capacitance figures you gave are in pF/ft, not in pF/m. The correct figures are 3.3 times higher...

timbloke wrote:Lets say I wanted to make a really good set of phono leads for my turntable, a really good set of interconnects for line level sources and a really good set to go between my pre and my power amp. What would the best choice of cable for each run?
Don't worry too much much about ease of soldering or connector types as I'm pretty good with a soldering iron and already know what connectors I'm going to use.



Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013
faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine