Shure SC35C... Highly recommended

[Ldg]

If you looked at my crude "u-block" bearings you would immediately see this is bearing rattle hell! .......

OK, I get it. That's exactly a 'non-ideal', agree it's a likely explanation !

All good stuff.

[dualhead]

Any homebrew method to measure 5 grams VTF? My Shure gauge only goes up to three grams. I tried balancing a penny on the one end, but the results are suspect.

[dlaloum]

$20 digital scale....

Picked it up off ebay! Very Handy!

[dualhead]

Thabnks, broke after the cart purchase though.

[dualhead]

OK, so I shot low on the VTF (3 grams) and dialed it up by ear. Definitely around 5 grams. Before I get lost in failed attempts at articulating sound experience let me say that I , like the OP, experienced the characteristic of this cart that kept me wanting to spin more records. Nothing in particular, I just was listening to music more than my system. I liked that. So for the sound, I noticed several things compared to the AT that previously inhabited this setup. First, the sound was more forward, but it was not shallow. In fact, on Michael Hoenig's "Exit Northern Wasteland," the ghostly out of phase stuff in the periphery was more evident and the space was wider. Second, on 90125 by Yes the change of textures on "Owner of a Lonely Heart," were accurate and all the little imaging gymnastics on the guitar solo were were panned well and sounded confident not hazey. On both LP's, there was zero noise. On Dire Sraits S/T LP the vocals were detailed and had an "in the room" quality. Especially "In the gallery," where you could here the attitude in his voice really well. All in all, I liked the cart! Early to call it definitively, but so far a positive experience. Some of the subtley of the AT may be missing, but the fun factor kind of makes up for this. I don't find myself missing much.

[audiopile]

I realize this is a little off topic - but I've got one of these bodies lying around and am curious if any one has tried the JICO SAS out on a SC35C ?

[dlaloum]

Keep in mind that the Jico SAS and the Jico SAS are not necessarily the same...

What I mean by that is.. I have the Jico SAS N97xE, VN5MR and VN5xMR - all 3 SAS styli have measurably different cantilever resonance profiles... each designed to match with the cartridge inductance and original cartridge load specifications from Shure.

An M97xE can be run with a VN5xMR SAS stylus (designed for the V15VxMR) but due to the differing design, the loading needs to be adjusted to balance.

The end result (assuming that you adjust the loading) is very very very close to V15VxMR performance, and better than you can achieve with the N97xE... the V15V versions are designed based on a higher cantilever resonance frequency combined with lower inductance and capacitance - so the electrical frequency response is very flat with a very slight rise at the top followed by a dop - which nicely balances out the cantilever resonance.

The N97xE is designed around a much larger electrical resonance and a steeper HF dip, which in turn requires a cantilever resonance at a much lower frequency to balance things out.

The "Quality" of the sound is the same as the cantilevers and needles are identical - BUT... the suspension and damping are tweaked individually for the particular model...

I am certain it would sound excellent!

[Ldg]

...The end result (assuming that you adjust the loading) is very very very close to V15VxMR performance....!

There's much more to performance than just frequency response profile......

By the time one has a new JICO stylus tip, cantilever and suspension, dozens of non-ideals will have changed. And it doesn't resemble an SC35C any more, so that's a bit of a miss, by accounts. It's the original that gets fave reviews. And to sub in a Jico seems to defeat the point here.

[flavio81]

UPDATE:

I mounted the SC35C on another arm, a Linn Basik Plus (10gm eff arm mass not including cart). This one has decent arm bearings. The distortion problem didn't seem to appear (as it did with the Lenco arm). So all points out that my DIY arm bearings (on the lenco arm) were the culprit of IGD (at loud cut levels).

With this arm it tracks with no problem at 4gm and you might get away with less VTF, although i wouldn't do this.

Another UPDATE: To me it's very evident that the SC35C transfers way more energy to the arm base (because of the low compliance). When i put my finger on the arm base, i can definitely feel the music vibrating on it (with the SC35C), where as doing the same with a N97xE stylus mounted (high compliance) will give far, far less vibrations.

[Laudanum]

Another UPDATE: To me it's very evident that the SC35C transfers way more energy to the arm base (because of the low compliance). When i put my finger on the arm base, i can definitely feel the music vibrating on it (with the SC35C), where as doing the same with a N97xE stylus mounted (high compliance) will give far, far less vibrations.

Just asking ... are you comparing both styli at the same tracking force?

[dualhead]

Confirmed on the energy transfer. Rush Bob Ludwig mastering is like the damn arm is gonna take off! Major vibration!

[flavio81]

Another UPDATE: To me it's very evident that the SC35C transfers way more energy to the arm base (because of the low compliance). When i put my finger on the arm base, i can definitely feel the music vibrating on it (with the SC35C), where as doing the same with a N97xE stylus mounted (high compliance) will give far, far less vibrations.

Just asking ... are you comparing both styli at the same tracking force?

How could i? One is intended for 0.75-1.25g and the other for 4-5g.

[Laudanum]

I just wanted clarification in order to bring up a point/ask a question. With the higher tracking force, 4G, wouldnt it be usual to feel more vibration at the arm base compared to tracking at .75 - 1.25G, regardless of compliance?

[bauzace50]

HI,
the SC35C tracks at 4 -5 grams, sells for $39.00 and seems to have identical specifications as the M35X selling for $75.00 but tracking at 1.5 - 3 grams.
Although I've not seen the compliance specifications, my guess is that this is the difference between the two. Is this correct?

And why sould this alone make such a large difference in price? (Everything else seems to be identical).
Regards,
bauzace50