the home of the turntable

What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

name that tune

What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby danieldust » 11 May 2012 03:04

I have heard people say bad things about Blue Note's Direct Metal Master releases. Are all DMMs bad, or is it just the Blue Notes? Are there examples of good DMM records? I have a few and can't seem to find anything wrong with them, but I'm not the hardcore audiophile that many here are. What's your take on them?
SFH Records - prog, fusion, folk & more: http://sfhrecords.gemm.com/
User avatar
danieldust
senior member
 
Posts: 945
Images: 84
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 22:21
Location: Northeast Florida

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby zwhita » 11 May 2012 16:19

I have an '84 DMM print of Cannonball Adderley's Somethin' Else and think it sounds great. Seems quality materials. Not sure what the problem would be.
User avatar
zwhita
senior member
 
Posts: 107
Joined: 15 Jul 2010 18:16
Location: Dallas, TX USA

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby flavio81 » 11 May 2012 17:51

Nothing is wrong with DMM. DMM is great. Any problem with sound quality can't be atributed to DMM but to monkeys disguised as engineers.

DMM was the culmination of decades of Teutonic ingenuity in vinyl cutting.
User avatar
flavio81
contributor
 
Posts: 4553
Images: 32
Joined: 16 Sep 2009 23:45
Location: Lima

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby dovstar » 11 May 2012 20:08

If you Wiki DMM you'll read something about the high frequencies being different from the traditional method. I guess you'd need to have both kinds to do a comparison.
dovstar
junior member
 
Posts: 15
Joined: 07 Apr 2012 02:37
Location: Los Angeles, CA

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby scrutney » 12 May 2012 01:11

danieldust wrote:I have a few and can't seem to find anything wrong with them,


i have a dmm of frankie goes to hollywood's 2nd album, "liverpool".

as i remember, the only thing wrong with it was that it wasn't "welcome to the pleasuredome." #-o
User avatar
scrutney
senior member
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 18:22
Location: st. augustine fl. usa.

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby Cabbage Patch Elvis » 12 May 2012 01:55

scrutney wrote:
danieldust wrote:I have a few and can't seem to find anything wrong with them,


i have a dmm of frankie goes to hollywood's 2nd album, "liverpool".

as i remember, the only thing wrong with it was that it wasn't "welcome to the pleasuredome." #-o


You make an excellent point. Bravo! [-o<
I know it's only rock & roll, but I like it.
User avatar
Cabbage Patch Elvis
senior member
 
Posts: 1898
Joined: 01 Feb 2012 18:00
Location: The Pacific Northwest

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby MonkeyBoy » 12 May 2012 01:56

Sara K's "Water Falls" is DMM and a number of us here use it as a reference record. Have you heard anyone say anything good about Blue Note's DMMs?
Music isn't an escape from life, it's one of the reasons to be alive in the first place!
User avatar
MonkeyBoy
senior member
 
Posts: 1978
Images: 64
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 21:44
Location: Maryland, USA

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby danieldust » 12 May 2012 03:00

MonkeyBoy wrote:Have you heard anyone say anything good about Blue Note's DMMs?


Not that I can recall. I've only seen a couple references to them being bad sounding, and I'm only a beginner when it comes to collecting Blue Notes.
SFH Records - prog, fusion, folk & more: http://sfhrecords.gemm.com/
User avatar
danieldust
senior member
 
Posts: 945
Images: 84
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 22:21
Location: Northeast Florida

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby danieldust » 12 May 2012 03:14

The Wikipedia article on DMM is fascinating, dovstar. Thanks for the heads up.
SFH Records - prog, fusion, folk & more: http://sfhrecords.gemm.com/
User avatar
danieldust
senior member
 
Posts: 945
Images: 84
Joined: 18 Mar 2005 22:21
Location: Northeast Florida

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby gabriel1998 » 12 May 2012 14:24

DMM are friggin AWFUL. Don't know about other DIGITAL MASTER METAL or what ever it is but Blue note DMM are terrible when compared even to some later Capitol Blue note reissue. I rather download an MP3 than to listen to Blue Note DMM. Some morons are asking 50 Bucks for DMM pressing on ebay. A sucker is born everyday! The most I've paid is 5 bucks and that's because Eric Dolphy "Other Aspect" Lp has only been released on DMM. Its still extremely thin and metallic.
Rega P25|AM Tonearm|GT SubPlatter & White Delrin Platter| Denon 103D WB| Bob's Cinemag|Hagerman Cornet 2|Aikido Octal Linestage|Denon POA 1500|Tubelab SSE| Axiom M60ti
gabriel1998
senior member
 
Posts: 305
Images: 10
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 12:39
Location: Virginia

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby philbrown » 14 May 2012 18:07

gabriel1998 wrote:DMM are friggin AWFUL. Don't know about other DIGITAL MASTER METAL or what ever it is but Blue note DMM are terrible when compared even to some later Capitol Blue note reissue. I rather download an MP3 than to listen to Blue Note DMM. Some morons are asking 50 Bucks for DMM pressing on ebay. A sucker is born everyday! The most I've paid is 5 bucks and that's because Eric Dolphy "Other Aspect" Lp has only been released on DMM. Its still extremely thin and metallic.



I'm curious how many DMM-which, by the way, stands for Direct Metal Mastering-masters you've cut to have such an opinion? And how many years as a mastering engineer? Because you clearly must have a deep understanding of the process to feel so strongly about it.
Oh, and just for the record I'm one of the morons who used to cut DMM masters.
Phil Brown
User avatar
philbrown
senior member
 
Posts: 369
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 17:51
Location: Oakland, CA

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby Dr Pan K » 14 May 2012 19:57

hi phil

the way i record it the DMM technique was design to skip one passage so theoretically the sound should be better, but due to some technical reasons of the period the final result was somewhat compressed.

could u tell us a couple of words about the DMM ??
User avatar
Dr Pan K
contributor
 
Posts: 470
Images: 2
Joined: 09 Jul 2011 15:17
Location: Athens

Greece

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby pivot » 14 May 2012 20:28

My personal opinion is much of the hubbub about DMM has to do with the fact that early digital recording/mastering was coming out at approximatly the same time.

I have DMM mastered LPs that I think sound just fine AND I have DMM master LPs that sound thin, compressed and harsh. For the most part the "bad" DMM are also from digital, either originally recorded or remastered tranfers of analog tape.

The Blue Notes I have that are DMM and not from digital masters sound "okay" to me BUT I do not have previous issues non-DMM copies of these titles to compare to. I would not be shocked if original pressings from near the orignal release date sound better.

They DO NOT sound like MP3. Direct Metal Mastering is NOT a digital process in and of itself but many, not all, early "digital" LPs were cut using DMM.

IMHO DMM gets tarred with the early digital brush.
Kevin R-M

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

Hamlet Act 1
pivot
senior member
 
Posts: 3717
Images: 9
Joined: 27 Dec 2002 15:31
Location: Albany, NY USA

United States of America

Re: What's wrong with Direct Metal Mastering?

Postby gabriel1998 » 14 May 2012 21:24

philbrown wrote:
gabriel1998 wrote:DMM are friggin AWFUL. Don't know about other DIGITAL MASTER METAL or what ever it is but Blue note DMM are terrible when compared even to some later Capitol Blue note reissue. I rather download an MP3 than to listen to Blue Note DMM. Some morons are asking 50 Bucks for DMM pressing on ebay. A sucker is born everyday! The most I've paid is 5 bucks and that's because Eric Dolphy "Other Aspect" Lp has only been released on DMM. Its still extremely thin and metallic.



I'm curious how many DMM-which, by the way, stands for Direct Metal Mastering-masters you've cut to have such an opinion? And how many years as a mastering engineer? Because you clearly must have a deep understanding of the process to feel so strongly about it.
Oh, and just for the record I'm one of the morons who used to cut DMM masters.
Phil Brown


I'm curious to see how an "ENGINEER" failed to comprehend my post? I'm confused? Did I call the people who "Mastered" these DMM....morons? or was it the ebay seller trying to get 50 bucks for a blue note DMM? and has been trying to sell this Blue note DMM pressing for the past year now. oh, my bad! Are you the ebay seller :?: So now we need to be engineers to have an opinion on how they sound? a deep understanding of the process? lol. Blue note DMM sound friggin awful to me, Period. And just in case you missed it. Which seems to be alot. I don't know about other DMM's which I clearly stated in my last post. But I'll tell you what. For people who are just starting to collect Blue note's, Here is an article published 15 years ago:

http://kleene.ss.uci.edu/~rmay/Bluenote.html

And here we have Londonjazzcollector. Actually, the first time I ran across this article, His description of people who thought that BN DMM sounded good was at the time, the most histerical piece on vinyl collecting I've ever read. I'm still laughing :lol: Now there is just some story about a village or island.

http://londonjazzcollector.wordpress.com/
Rega P25|AM Tonearm|GT SubPlatter & White Delrin Platter| Denon 103D WB| Bob's Cinemag|Hagerman Cornet 2|Aikido Octal Linestage|Denon POA 1500|Tubelab SSE| Axiom M60ti
gabriel1998
senior member
 
Posts: 305
Images: 10
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 12:39
Location: Virginia

Next

Return to Music and Records


Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013

faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine