the home of the turntable

Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

the thin end of the wedge

Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby dirklenart » 11 Jun 2012 14:18

Hi guys

I'm hesitating what my next step should be after upgrading a Thorens TD160 - Denon DL-110.

I can spend some money on a Heed Quasar http://www.heedaudio.hu/en/products/modular-line/quasar/details(now using Rega Fono MM) or I can invest the same amount of money in an Okki Nokki RCM.

What would you recommmend?

Dirk
Thorens TD160 - Nagaoka MP200 - Rega Fono MM - Heed Obelisk SI MkII - B&W685
User avatar
dirklenart
junior member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: 28 Apr 2012 10:35
Location: Ghent

Belgium

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby bauzace50 » 11 Jun 2012 14:34

Hello Dirk,

Your present equipment is good for substantially satisfactory sound, with sufficient resolution to identify the sound of debris on records. And clean records have a higher probability to last longer.

My choice would be the record washing machine now. It will give immediately better sound upon playback, and help in saving your prized record collection and diamond tip.

To share a personal little thought: I had resisted purchasing a washing machine for too long, but was floored when playing my very first Washed LP! How could I have omitted such a benefit? The benefits are too large to omit.
Regards,
bauzace50

PS- By the way, records do not need to be washed on each playback occasion. Only when they appear to have gathered debris, case by case.
User avatar
bauzace50
senior member
 
Posts: 7507
Joined: 11 Jun 2005 15:48
Location: Guayama, Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby 1200y3 » 11 Jun 2012 16:43

(I am assuming this is a MM cart.)
You will need clean records to review any equipment, and there is a variety of phono preamps to try.

In fact, millions of preamps exist worldwide on the second hand market, and there is only a few record washers.

P.S. I think I would buy the spin clean for its ability to scrub the record under water (fluid). This cleaner is very affordable. (The only irony is that I would still use a vacuum to dry the disc!) Actually as long as all the wetting agent is removed, say with a distilled water rinse, the disc should dry automatically.
1200y3
senior member
 
Posts: 2183
Joined: 27 Mar 2009 14:43
Location: regina,sk

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby madog99 » 13 Jun 2012 02:01

build or cobble together a vacuum system of some sort for less than $150 . It is the best upgrade you can do , I was really floored once I started using one.
madog99
contributor
 
Posts: 175
Images: 3
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 17:51
Location: Ottawa Canada

Canada

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby Tedrick » 13 Jun 2012 17:17

bauzace50 wrote:Hello Dirk,

Your present equipment is good for substantially satisfactory sound, with sufficient resolution to identify the sound of debris on records. And clean records have a higher probability to last longer.

My choice would be the record washing machine now. It will give immediately better sound upon playback, and help in saving your prized record collection and diamond tip.

To share a personal little thought: I had resisted purchasing a washing machine for too long, but was floored when playing my very first Washed LP! How could I have omitted such a benefit? The benefits are too large to omit.
Regards,
bauzace50

PS- By the way, records do not need to be washed on each playback occasion. Only when they appear to have gathered debris, case by case.

+1. Once you've listened to records that have been thoroughly cleaned on a good RCM, you'll wonder how you ever got by without one (and why you waited so long to get one, too).
Tedrick
contributor
 
Posts: 759
Joined: 02 May 2007 04:47
Location: Florida

United States of America

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby dirklenart » 13 Jun 2012 17:47

Thanks for all your answers which seem to point in the same direction :)
Thorens TD160 - Nagaoka MP200 - Rega Fono MM - Heed Obelisk SI MkII - B&W685
User avatar
dirklenart
junior member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: 28 Apr 2012 10:35
Location: Ghent

Belgium

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby nabil » 13 Jun 2012 23:25

Seems like you've already decided, but I'm going to pipe in anyway. The largest single improvement I've heard in my vinyl system was upgrading my phono section-that said, I wouldn't have been able to hear how much my phono stage upgrade improved my system without my Okki-Nokki.
User avatar
nabil
senior member
 
Posts: 518
Images: 5
Joined: 17 Mar 2005 17:52
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma

United States of America

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby dirklenart » 14 Jun 2012 08:13

Thanks Nabil. I think I will try to get both. Depends on how much the second hand Heed will be sold for. I think you are right in saying that both are needed upgrades.
Cheers
Thorens TD160 - Nagaoka MP200 - Rega Fono MM - Heed Obelisk SI MkII - B&W685
User avatar
dirklenart
junior member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: 28 Apr 2012 10:35
Location: Ghent

Belgium

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby Dinohyus Hollandi » 14 Jun 2012 08:23

Yeah, ideally you'd get both, but if budget is a bit tight you could make do with something like a Disco Antistat (around 55 euro new). Just ditch the supplied fluid; that stuff is awful and will only make matters worse. If you mix your own concoction of distilled water and alcohol you should get satisfactory results.
That Heed is a very nice piece of kit BTW...
Narf!
User avatar
Dinohyus Hollandi
senior member
 
Posts: 379
Images: 34
Joined: 28 Jan 2011 19:09
Location: Near Amsterdam

Netherlands

Re: Invest in better phono preamp or RCM first?

Postby dirklenart » 25 Jun 2012 13:08

Hi guys

Time to update this thread. I've bought the Heed off Ebay(400 euro) but unfortunately upon arrival there were problems with it, which I found out to be a broken mains cable. This caused humm, crackle and noise.
Before I sent it back I've fiddled a bit with the cable and found a position in which I didn't have any problems. So I got the chance to listen to it with my gear.
It sounded good, but not that good, and a lot of that impression came from the fact it had more gain in the MM section than my Rega Fono. I think to hear the real merits of the Heed I would have to upgrade my front-end first: better cartridge and better arm (the Thorens itself has received all the mods already).
So I invested the refund immediately in buying an Okki Nokki after hesitating a whole afternoon to buy a Lehmann Black Cube SE off Ebay. But in the end I decided against it.
I'm waiting for the RCM right now, together with a whole bunch of first pressings bought in shops and off Ebay. I got my 3 squeeze bottles already lined up to be filled with the Okki Nokki fluid, the l'Art du Son fluid and the last one for plain distilled water. I've also ordered extra brushes: one Mobile Fidelity and one Clearaudio wet brush, together with a pack of Mobile Fidelity sleeves.
I'm sooooo ready to get cleaning :)

I'll let you know my findings when I've started cleaning!

Regards

Dirk
Thorens TD160 - Nagaoka MP200 - Rega Fono MM - Heed Obelisk SI MkII - B&W685
User avatar
dirklenart
junior member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: 28 Apr 2012 10:35
Location: Ghent

Belgium

Return to Cartridges and Preamps


Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013

faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine