Advanced Stylus Shapes: Pics, discussion, patents.

the thin end of the wedge
Post Reply
1200y3
long player
long player
Posts: 2949
Joined: 27 Mar 2009 13:43
Location: regina,sk

Post by 1200y3 » 09 Nov 2009 23:57

The square shanks look nice!

The fine line must be more immune to cantilever flexing and twisting because of a better fit.

Alec124c41
vinyl engineer
vinyl engineer
Canada
Posts: 22889
Joined: 28 Oct 2002 03:24
Location: North of Toronto, Canada

Post by Alec124c41 » 10 Nov 2009 03:24

Bebé Tonto wrote: Also you can see that the Shibata seems to be very easy to manufacture!!
Not for me! :lol:
It's OK, I'll just buy them.

Cheers,
Alec

Axon
senior member
senior member
Posts: 270
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 00:15
Location: Austin, TX

Post by Axon » 10 Nov 2009 04:47

Thanks, this is a really nice summary.

lini
vinyl addict
vinyl addict
Germany
Posts: 6619
Joined: 22 Sep 2007 05:17
Location: Munich/Bavaria

Post by lini » 10 Nov 2009 05:06

Flavio: Hmmm - are you sure that Denon close-up actually shows a standard 103? Doesn't really look conical to me...

And in my view AT's LinearContact is more like a further developed Shibata/Hughes than like a Vital/FineLine...

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini

fantasia
senior member
senior member
Posts: 480
Joined: 20 Jul 2004 09:59
Location: albury NSW

Post by fantasia » 10 Nov 2009 05:31

Thank you flavio

the info is well presented and easy to understand especially the assumption re actual contact area.

my experience with Shibatas only bonded ones is that they also seem to
play older worn Lps which makes sense given the contact area. They would be in contact with less worn or even fresh vinyl.

I suspect fresh vinyl as very few second hand Lps seem to have been played with exotic stylus shapes, usually nothing better than a conical /spherical.

fantasia

TA

Post by TA » 10 Nov 2009 06:35

Thanks flavio, good review.

A note on the Shibata. I think that the contact area is curved, which has some effects not observed with later fine-lines.

Terry Robinson
senior member
senior member
Posts: 490
Joined: 07 Dec 2007 03:51
Location: Beautiful, sunny Australia.

Advanced Stylus Shapes: Pics, discussion, patents.

Post by Terry Robinson » 10 Nov 2009 07:06

Evening all.

Thank you so very much Mr. Flavio for your detailed discussion on various gramophone needles.

I never knew so many different types existed -- anyone know about the Ortofon Replicant needle, or the many others that exist. I guess these are still coming in another article.

I consider this article the best I have ever read on this topic: and I have read many over several decades.

Cheers,

Terry.

Bebé Tonto

Post by Bebé Tonto » 10 Nov 2009 07:44

wrote:Thanks flavio, good review.

A note on the Shibata. I think that the contact area is curved, which has some effects not observed with later fine-lines.
Yes, i mention it, here is a diagram:

https://www.vinylengine.com/images/foru ... agujas.jpg

But what effects can it have? Has this been studied?

Bebé Tonto

Post by Bebé Tonto » 10 Nov 2009 07:46

lini wrote:Flavio: Hmmm - are you sure that Denon close-up actually shows a standard 103? Doesn't really look conical to me...

And in my view AT's LinearContact is more like a further developed Shibata/Hughes than like a Vital/FineLine...

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini
Hi Dear Lini,

Check out again the diagrams for the Shibata. The Shibata is characterised by two back "cuts" on the diamond, and a teardrop-shaped footprint. Plus a curved vertical profile (see previous post.)

The AT's Linear Contact has none of those characteristics.

Bebé Tonto

Re: Advanced Stylus Shapes: Pics, discussion, patents.

Post by Bebé Tonto » 10 Nov 2009 07:48

Terry Robinson wrote:I consider this article the best I have ever read on this topic: and I have read many over several decades.
Thanks for the compliments, Terry!!

lini
vinyl addict
vinyl addict
Germany
Posts: 6619
Joined: 22 Sep 2007 05:17
Location: Munich/Bavaria

Post by lini » 10 Nov 2009 12:39

Flavio: Hence the "further developed": Imagine two more cuts, so the curved part of the true Shibata also looks more like a triangle, but flatter and steeper than on the other side - the result is pretty much what an AT LinearContact looks like. I.e., it's also asymmetrical front to back (which unfortunately isn't well visible in AT's drawing) and actually looks very similar to the tip shape shown in your DL103 pic - which is why I'd rather suspect this not to be a standard DL103, but one of the variants with more sophisticated tip shape.

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini

TA

Post by TA » 10 Nov 2009 13:26

Bebé Tonto wrote:
wrote:Thanks flavio, good review.

A note on the Shibata. I think that the contact area is curved, which has some effects not observed with later fine-lines.
But what effects can it have? Has this been studied?
I've read that the curved align causes a force that pushes the stylus upwards during play, which in turn, may cause a not-so-smooth pattern of groove riding, and in the end, increased wear. The straight line-types do not have the same upward force.

lini
vinyl addict
vinyl addict
Germany
Posts: 6619
Joined: 22 Sep 2007 05:17
Location: Munich/Bavaria

Post by lini » 10 Nov 2009 13:49

Thomas: I'm not quite sure though, whether this actually comes from the slight curve in the contact area or rather from the not very steeply ascending triangle part...

Greetings from Munich!

Manfred / lini

Bebé Tonto

Post by Bebé Tonto » 10 Nov 2009 14:13

wrote:
Bebé Tonto wrote:
wrote:Thanks flavio, good review.

A note on the Shibata. I think that the contact area is curved, which has some effects not observed with later fine-lines.
But what effects can it have? Has this been studied?
I've read that the curved align causes a force that pushes the stylus upwards during play, which in turn, may cause a not-so-smooth pattern of groove riding, and in the end, increased wear. The straight line-types do not have the same upward force.
Hi Thomas!!

This sounds like the "pinch effect" typical of the Sphericals, but this is caused only because the side radius ("r") is too big.

I don't think this would happen with all the other types (elliptical, HE, shibata, etc) which have a narrow "r" radius.

Source?

Bebé Tonto

Post by Bebé Tonto » 10 Nov 2009 14:24

lini wrote:Flavio: Hence the "further developed": Imagine two more cuts, so the curved part of the true Shibata also looks more like a triangle, but flatter and steeper than on the other side - the result is pretty much what an AT LinearContact looks like. I.e., it's also asymmetrical front to back (which unfortunately isn't well visible in AT's drawing) and actually looks very similar to the tip shape shown in your DL103 pic - which is why I'd rather suspect this not to be a standard DL103, but one of the variants with more sophisticated tip shape.
Very interesting observation on the AT, Manfred. Do you have pics? From the AT's diagram it looked like an Ogura.

And I will remove the Denon pic to avoid creating confusion.

Post Reply