the home of the turntable

Help Ressurecting an Odyssey - geometry and effective mass?

snap, crackle and pop

Postby AndrewL » 08 Feb 2009 21:53

johngordon wrote:Andrew,:
I suspect the original finish has been removed from you arm. It looks like the early Odyssey Engineering RP1 design from 1980. It was offered in various finishes, some in a black lacquer, others with custom colours, others chrome plated and/or anodised.



That's interesting, I had wrongly assumed they were all gold over brass and anodised ali, so this one has been stripped eh?


your arm appears to be a refinished RP1-P from 1981 which had a triangular base (later circular) and separate armrest, and had shims on a solid pillar.



Yep I recognise that....I have the shims and the base as you describe. I can see how that would have been easier to produce.


With the base in the photo you don't need an eccentric mount (which for me, originally, was a simple way of getting an adjustment like SME without having to mill out the slot and pillar mount...) therefore you don't need slots in the headshell, as you can vary the mounting distance to suit the true effective length (which used to vary depending on which cartridge was used...)

Can I clarify something regarding slots in headshells. The arms that have them are designed with a fixed mounting distance, ie the lateral pivot to spindle distance is unadjustable.



Isn't hindsight a wonderful thing :roll: it does seem to work pretty well, however, and having mounted it I am glad the headshell slots are there from the weight/mass perspective, it would have been too heavy otherwise...I would have had to make the headshell shorter instead - whomever said 'engineering was the art of compromise' was spot on.

By the way, its a great arm and I definitely think its been worth the effort to ressurect it.

-- Andrew
AndrewL
contributor
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 20:22

Postby johngordon » 08 Feb 2009 23:09

Thanks for the kind words, Andrew.
Engineering is definitely the art of compromise. Choosing on what to compromise is the real challenge. With the Odyssey, some I got right and others wrong. But it was a learning process, and, even now, continues to be so. There is always something to be learned.

John
User avatar
johngordon
member
 
Posts: 97
Images: 21
Joined: 29 Jan 2009 23:40
Location: London and Spain

Postby audioorigami » 14 Feb 2009 13:01

glad its all working out

what sort of finish are you wanting andrew??
User avatar
audioorigami
senior member
 
Posts: 1146
Images: 105
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 13:53
Location: scotland

United Kingdom

Postby AndrewL » 16 Feb 2009 21:18

Can you do a brushed aluminium effect? Match the domes etc?

-- Andrew
AndrewL
contributor
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 20:22

Postby audioorigami » 19 Feb 2009 18:33

yip :D
User avatar
audioorigami
senior member
 
Posts: 1146
Images: 105
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 13:53
Location: scotland

United Kingdom

Postby AndrewL » 21 Feb 2009 16:56

:)

Sorted....
AndrewL
contributor
 
Posts: 133
Joined: 17 Jan 2006 20:22

Postby odaey » 26 Feb 2009 00:42

AndrewL wrote:Thanks John, great to hear from you. Yes, didn't we have fun working this one out...be great to get the Odyssey history sometime.

Time for an update from my end.

I received the raw unfinished prototype from AudioOrigami a week or two ago, I had to get some cart bolts to mount the 103 though the deep headshell, amazing how hard it is to find 25mm M2.5 A2 Stainless Steel.

As you can see I strapped some tonearm cable down the side with sticky tape to get me going. The idea is to try it out before any of the expensive finishing and wiring work is done.

Image

If it all works out it will get shipped back to j7 for finishing and wiring.

-- Andrew


Superb looking turntable, I bet it sounds every bit as Good.

Can't wait to see the finished wand.
odaey
member
 
Posts: 33
Images: 4
Joined: 22 Apr 2007 06:45

PreviousNext

Return to Turntables and Tonearms


Design and Content © Vinyl Engine 2002-2013

faq | site policy | advertising | hifiengine