| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ronenash
junior member
Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 12
Location: Israel
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:24 am Post subject: Quality of Transcriptors Fluid arm |
 |
|
|
Hi all,
I have a transcriptors Hydraulic Reference that fell into my hands. I have restored the deck and its a gorgeous to look at. Sounds decent too. Can anyone comment on the quality of the Fluid arm that came with the turntable? Its a unipivot design with silicon damping.
Thanks
Ronenash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abril
contributor

Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 761
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:16 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Hi
Perfectly good arm for a typical seventies high compliance cartridge such as the Shure V15 or the ADC XLM,but not suited to anything energetic with low compliance.
Got a cartridge in mind for it?
Tends to be a bit fussy as regards maintaining alignment,although nowhere near as bad as the early Hadcock I replaced mine with many years back.
Which is it 9 or 10in
PS
There is a manual for the arm in the library |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ronenash
junior member
Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 12
Location: Israel
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 2:05 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Thanks Abril,
Currently I am using it with a Shure V15 type III. I have no idea what's the difference between 9 and 10 pin version and I do not know how to identify it.
Which arm would you recommend for the Transcriptor Hyraulic Reference if I considered replacing the arm?
Regards,
Ronenash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RED_One
senior member
Joined: 17 Dec 2006
Posts: 478
Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abril
contributor

Joined: 13 Oct 2002
Posts: 761
Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Quote: | | between 9 and 10 pin version |
9 and 10 inch
measure the pivot to stylus distance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tubes4life
senior member

Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Posts: 75
Location: Queens, New York
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Hi Ronenash -
I would keep the Fluid Arm since it's an integral part of the Hydraulic Reference Turntable in both appearance and design concept. I'm currently restoring my Hydraulic Reference I've had it since the 70s. Personally, I don't think anything should be altered with perhaps only one exception - the RCA lead-outs.
The Fluid Arm works well with a variety of cartridges with different weights and compliance figures. I paired it successfully with the highly compliant(laterally) Decca SC4E which physically weighs in at 14 grams, and with the lowish compliant Decca Gold which has a mere 4-gram weight.
Good luck with the TT.
Andy
For those interested in pictures of the Fluid Arm:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bigears
lost in space
Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 1643
Location: uk
|
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Hi ronenash
I'd hand on to that arm if I were you. There's preccious few about and in its day, and even today its a damn fine arm. My father has one hooked upto his Transcriptors hydraulic deck and fitted with a V15 with Mk5 MR stylus, it is more than a match for my sme 309/dv20 combo. Setting up is fiddly and wiring might possibly benefit from an upgrade but other than that a better arm than the 3009 series 3 in many respects. It was specifically designed for the V15 and similar high compliance MM's. A great find! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ronenash
junior member
Joined: 10 May 2008
Posts: 12
Location: Israel
|
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Thanks Andy and Bigears.
I am using the transcriptors with a Shure V15 Type III and it indeed sounds good. Not as good as my Thorens TD125 with custom plinith and Clearaudio pickup.
R. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|